On 10/23/2019 3:05 PM, Noel Butler via mailop wrote:
Reality is, your mere suggestion of regulation / courts to make
providers accept your e-mail makes you a liability to my services.
That will never happen, precedent already set, remember that West
Australian super spammer from decades gone by, forget its name, he tried
that after a DNSBL (SORBS from memory??) blocked his trash, the courts
ruled they can block whoever they like, now might just be aussie, but if
your in the commonwealth at least that does hold weight, not sure about
in US but I dare say a defendant can use such a precedence to sway even
a US court.
US courts have ruled that providers are allowed to block under 47 U.S.
Code ยง 230. Pretty much reaffirms the whole private ownership thing.
I was more saying, if I know you are litigious piece of crap that
doesn't respect my rights to control unwanted e-mail, then for my own
sake it was better if you not have access to ANY of my systems at all
from the start.
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
