On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:03:52AM +0000, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote: > > On 11 Feb 2020, at 17:01, Scott Mutter via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: [..] > > Your statement is certainly valid, and I don't mean to sound whiny. But it > > is also frustrating when providers (usually large providers, like AT&T) > > appear to block an IP for... no apparent reason. The IP is clean on all > > blacklists and SenderScore is 99. If there were other factors in play I'd > > be more apt to understand and investigate who is sending out spam on this > > server. But it's just AT&T blocking it. > > > Public blacklists and senderscore are an incredibly limited and, in my > experience, pretty useless way to determine your mail is fine. I???ve had > hundreds of sales inquiries over the years from folks who admit to me they > are spamming. Yet, they will have Senderscores >90 and no public blocklists. > > Lack of negative data does not indicate good behavior.
Right, but the way around, for bad behavior one should have and provide data to prove it. Johann _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
