> Once-only invitations to opt-in sound cool. Not to me - we tell marketers they can't ask permission by spamming, so I don't think anybody else should get a free pass either.
IT. DOES. NOT. SCALE. Nobody gives a flying flamingo about who the sender is or what the purpose of the messaging is. IT. DOES. NOT. SCALE. > 100% agreed, albeit rfc2142 addresses are assumed to be implicitly opted-in > for > the corresponding kind of messages. If there was a point, but since the data itself is diiba daaba liiba laaba, I'd say it's on a level with the work of the late Marc Perkel, may he rest in peace. CHALLENGE/RESPONSE anyone? -- Atro Tossavainen, Chairman of the Board Infinite Mho Oy, Helsinki, Finland tel. +358-44-5000 600, http://www.infinitemho.fi/ _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
