> Another relevant piece of data. The organization that was named in the suit > and has received a permanent injunction against it has been voluntarily > dissolved and struck off the UK registry of companies. > > https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05303831 > > There is no one covered under this injunction as the entity does not exist.
They still technically (at least nominally) seemed to have an agent for service in London, who was served in October, 2019; Spamhaus didn't dissolve that particular UK entity until March of 2020 (see https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05303831), five months after they were (ostensibly) served in London. Also, SpamhausTech still lists its address as being in London - so under the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil (i.e. a court may find that they can't claim they don't exist in the UK if they have an affiliated entity that does) they can/could have/may be able to enforce against them: https://www.spamhaustech.com/privacy-policy/ Of course, this is all basically mooted by the fact that the final judgement was only for $1 as DBUSA never submitted a damages accounting, and they are in Chapter 11, so it seems highly unlikely that they are going to spend money to pursue this on the off chance that they might pervail. Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School CEO, SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
