On 08/06/2022 21.25, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
so the false positive rate for the new rule is better. It doesn't even need to be a new rule, maybe your reputation just decreased slightly and it now is below the threshold.
I know of a couple of similar cases -- to me it seems Google's Bayesian heuristic (if there is such a thing) was over-zealous or something. It did not seem to matter if the outgoing messages passed SPF tests and/or had a correct DKIM signature: dsn=5.0.0, stat=Service unavailable. However, I haven't seen those today. Brandon, can you please look if your reject rates were suddenly up for a while, I'm sure there are statistics available? -- /* * * Otto J. Makela <o...@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */ /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */ /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */ /* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */ _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
