Hi, Dňa 26. augusta 2022 13:36:30 UTC používateľ Dave Crocker via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> napísal: > >On 8/26/2022 3:38 AM, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote: >> Signing with 2 identical d= but different s= is unusual, but I don’t think >> it’s prohibited anywhere. > >It's certainly not prohibited in the DKIM specification.
Is not that used in dual sign (RSA & EC)? The same domain, but different selector (and algo)... OP: please tell us which site is doing this. While you can easy solve it on your side (in this case), it is wrongly implemented check on their side, thus can be interested to know who is doing it. BTW, as i am do dual signing, i often see in reports, that some (most of?) sites wrongly interpret unknown (for them) algorhitm as failed signature, instead of ignore it (as RFC says). regards -- Slavko _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
