On February 16, 2023 8:57:49 PM EST, Mark Alley via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> 
wrote:
>As long as the organizational domain you want reports for is the same
>as
>you have published in the DMARC RUA/RUF "mailto" tags, then no, you do
>not
>need it to be able to receive said reports.
>
>- Mark Alley
>
>On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, 7:47 PM H <age...@meddatainc.com> wrote:
>
>> On February 16, 2023 6:37:42 PM EST, Mark Alley via mailop <
>> mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>> >You only need to create that record if you are sending the
>> >aggregate/failure reports for a particular domain that is different
>> >from
>> >the one the reports are actually on behalf of.
>> >
>> >So for example, if you owned domain1.com and wanted to send RUA/RUF
>> >reports
>> >for domain1.com to a mailbox at domain2.com (assuming you own
>domain2),
>> >you
>> >would need to create the TXT record in domain2 -
>> >"domain1.com._report._
>> >dmarc.domain2.com" IN TXT "v=DMARC1;"
>> >
>> >If you're using an external third party for report analysis, usually
>> >they
>> >have a wildcard published in their DNS for this "_report._dmarc"
>> >subdomain,
>> >so you don't have to worry about it in that case.
>> >
>> >
>> >- Mark Alley
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, 4:14 PM H via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
>wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 02/11/2023 07:42 PM, H wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 02/11/2023 01:55 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 2023-02-11 02:51 H via mailop wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >> On 02/10/2023 10:13 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2023-02-10 04:08, H via mailop wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I now did find that resource but it is written as general
>information
>> >and does not really tell how to get it going with IONOS if they run
>the
>> >email server...
>> >>
>> >> As far as I understood you not only use Ionos as your registrar,
>but
>> >also use their email server to send your email through. Ionos does
>not
>> >DKIM sign emails on behalf of its customers, at least they didn't do
>so
>> >in the past. So the answer is simple: You do not set up DKIM or
>DMARC
>> >at all, because you can't.
>> >> The instructions given by Ionos are only valid if your email is
>sent
>> >and signed by some other server and you want to add the DKIM public
>key
>> >to your domain hosted at Ionos.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> BR Oliver
>> >>
>> >> Thank you, you are starting with the first issue, ie whether I can
>> >even
>> >> have a DKIM record given that the domain is hosted by Ionos as is
>the
>> >mail
>> >> server. Upon my additional research I have come to the same
>> >conclusion as
>> >> you, ie not possible.
>> >>
>> >> By the way, I stumbled across this posting on the net -
>> >>
>> >
>>
>https://serverfault.com/questions/1030262/record-dkim-on-ionos-makes-sense
>> >> - that as far as I can tell is still true.
>> >>
>> >> So, I will now look at creating a DMARC record given that I have
>> >> previously created a SPF record and will not be able to have a
>DKIM
>> >record.
>> >>
>> >> I recommend against setting up a DMARC record with a policy of
>> >quarantine
>> >> or reject as long as DKIM signing isn‘t in place. The SPF
>> >authentication
>> >> will break for all forwarded messages as well as for all automatic
>> >replies
>> >> or non-delivery reports. It will do mire harm than good.
>> >> Of course if you‘re interested in the reporting you can create a
>> >DNARC
>> >> record with a none policy and only change that after you have
>moved
>> >to a
>> >> different email provider who supports DKIM.
>> >>
>> >> —
>> >> BR Oliver
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >> dmTECH GmbH
>> >> Am dm-Platz 1, 76227 Karlsruhe * Postfach 10 02 34, 76232
>Karlsruhe
>> >> Telefon 0721 5592-2500 Telefax 0721 5592-2777
>> >> dmt...@dm.de <dmt...@dm.de> * www.dmTECH.de <http://www.dmtech.de>
>> >> GmbH: Sitz Karlsruhe, Registergericht Mannheim, HRB 104927
>> >> Geschäftsführer: Christoph Werner, Martin Dallmeier, Roman Melcher
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >> Datenschutzrechtliche Informationen
>> >> Wenn Sie mit uns in Kontakt treten, beispielsweise wenn Sie an
>unser
>> >> ServiceCenter Fragen haben, bei uns einkaufen oder unser
>dialogicum
>> >in
>> >> Karlsruhe besuchen, mit uns in einer geschäftlichen Verbindung
>stehen
>> >oder
>> >> sich bei uns bewerben, verarbeiten wir personenbezogene Daten.
>> >> Informationen unter anderem zu den konkreten Datenverarbeitungen,
>> >> Löschfristen, Ihren Rechten sowie die Kontaktdaten unserer
>> >> Datenschutzbeauftragten finden Sie hier
>> >>
>> ><
>>
>https://www.dm.de/datenschutzerklaerung-kommunikation-mit-externen-493832>
>> >> .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mailop mailing
>> >listmailop@mailop.orghttps://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
>> >>
>> >> I see. As I am sure everyone has noticed, I am a complete newbie
>to
>> >> SPF/DKIM/DMARC (and a lot of other things.)
>> >>
>> >> Understanding your message, creating a DMARC with "none" policy
>would
>> >not
>> >> have any downside? When you say "reporting", what type of
>reporting
>> >would
>> >> that be and how could I benefit from such reporting?
>> >>
>> >> I have created a DMARC record and checked that it is correctly set
>up
>> >on a
>> >> DMARC check site. I understand that in order to receive these
>reports
>> >I
>> >> also need to create a EDV record among my domain DNS settings?
>> >>
>> >> Googling around I have not found any clear instructions on how to
>do
>> >so?
>> >>
>> >> At this time my understanding is that I need to create another TXT
>> >record
>> >> where the host field would contain "mydomain.com._report._
>> >> dmarc.mydomain.com" and the value field would contain "v=DMARC1".
>> >> Mydomain above would of course be replaced with the actual domain
>> >name.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mailop mailing list
>> >> mailop@mailop.org
>> >> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
>> >>
>>
>> Since I will be analyzing the data myself, no third-party involved, I
>do
>> not this type of record, correct?
>>

Thank you for your further clarification. It's up and running and I have 
reviewed the first report.

Besides reviewing the XML files themselves, I have also used one of the 
available websites. Even more convenient would be a linux utility to run on my 
own computer...
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to