Hi Mark, Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your inference, but are you saying we shouldn't reject based on a hard fail SPF record?
Thanks, Mark _________________________________________________________________ L. Mark Stone, Founder North America's Leading Zimbra VAR/BSP/Training Partner For Companies With Mission-Critical Email Needs ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Alley via mailop" <mailop@mailop.org> To: "mailop" <mailop@mailop.org> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 10:33:50 AM Subject: Re: [mailop] hotmail.com SPF forgot IPv6 This will definitely showcase how many receivers are still rejecting based on SPF failure by itself. There's already many threads on Reddit about this from regular consumers experiencing bounces they don't know what to do with, it's actually quite sad reading some of them. - Mark Alley On 8/18/2023 9:16 AM, Laurent S. via mailop wrote: Aloha hotmail, It seems since you recently changed your SPF and switched from ~all to -all. It would have been great if you didn't remove at the same time your IPv6 ranges from it. It seems the include:spf.protection.outlook.com was removed during the change. You might want to include it back. We are starting to receive quite a few tickets that our clients suddenly don't receive some mails from hotmail.com Best regards, Laurent _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [ mailto:mailop@mailop.org | mailop@mailop.org ] [ https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop | https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop ] _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
