Taavi Eomäe via mailop skrev den 2023-08-19 19:13:
On 19/08/2023 13:16, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
if it was hardfails, lets not ignore domain owners, ever
An SPF hardfail isn't sufficient for a reject or mark as spam either
though.
As previously mentioned, DKIM can be and should be sufficient.
not if dmarc will have aligment pass
spf have policy, dkim have only pass and fails, maillist wants
recipients to always see aligment in dmarc, so most maillists do take
ownerships, it should really just have done arc, or atps
But there's also the use-case where a trusted ARC forwarder is forced
to
cause a SPF fail,
eq arc signer have self spf fails on there own ?
but the recipient can still accept it. Without the
original letter having a DKIM signature.
imho opendmarc have not yet arc test in there source code, its planned,
but its raining here in danmark right now, lets hope it will be better
olso in clima changes
openarc is not stable yet, i lost fuglu, and amavisd-new missing
arc-sign/arc-verify, just like it does with dkim, hope it all will be
better
i am sure if amavisd did the arc, all maillists problems would be gone
like a candle light
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
