On 2024-02-04 23:02:31 (+0800), Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.

On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
Skip SRS and implement ARC for forwarded e-mails. This should solve all these problems.

Does anyone blindly trust ARC signatures from random domains?

I find it a huge difference between DKIM signatures (I sign this mail being from my domain) and ARC signature (I sign that this mail was received from whitehouse.gov properly verified and signed).

We don't blindly trust DKIM signatures either.  DKIM is only one signal.

In practice, in 2024, forwarding predominantly happens on the final hop before the mailbox. The mailbox provider can see that their users x, y, and z are receiving a lot of email addressed to {x,y,z}@alumni.example.edu, all of it with valid ARC signatures from alumni.example.edu. Given an appropriate sample size, those signatures begin to become trustworthy.

Mailbox providers can also provide a user interface for marking ARC domains as trustworthy. Similar to how some mailbox providers allow users to allowlist their forwarders for SPF checks.

Of course, the largest mailbox providers will continue to feed the signal into their opaque reputation machinery, so it's anyone's guess what will happen there.

Philip
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to