On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 02:11:04PM -0700, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > I guess the part that's new to me is the apparent widespread (enough) use > of the l= > parameter. I don't recall ever noticing its use before, though can't say > it was ever top > of mind when looking at various headers of messages.
I had noticed receiving some with l=1 not too long ago and went looking and saw some others with l=0. I thought it was pretty weird, especially the 1, but didn't record any details about it. mm (although it was kind of interesting that it passed) _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
