Because you're not selling spam filtering or reputation data, I don't think it
would be commercial use. On the sign-up page, they also state: "If you are a
non-commercial entity or a small business with low query volumes".
I guess they only really look at query volume in any case, as long as you're not
selling the data itself.
Groetjes,
Louis
On Saturday, February 8, 2025 8:14 PM, Tapio Peltonen via mailop
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 00:06, Al Iverson via mailop <[email protected]
> [[email protected]]> wrote:
>
> > But IMHO, DQS usage is safer. And free at the small end.
>
> The apply form of the free DQS was really hard to find on their
> website, I only found it when it was linked here.
>
> I'm not even sure if I qualify, since I represent a (small) commercial
> entity, athough we do not do any e-mail related business; we only use
> email as a means of communication and have very low e-mail volumes.
>
> The $250/year minimum "commercial licence" is not impossible for us
> but it is a bit steep, and we have to look into other DNSBL providers
> in case we do not qualify for free DQS.
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> [email protected] [[email protected]]
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
> [https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop]
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
