On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 00:06, Al Iverson via mailop <[email protected]> wrote:
> But IMHO, DQS usage is safer. And free at the small end. The apply form of the free DQS was really hard to find on their website, I only found it when it was linked here. I'm not even sure if I qualify, since I represent a (small) commercial entity, athough we do not do any e-mail related business; we only use email as a means of communication and have very low e-mail volumes. The $250/year minimum "commercial licence" is not impossible for us but it is a bit steep, and we have to look into other DNSBL providers in case we do not qualify for free DQS. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
