Which is why I asked about services that offer what I was thinking about.

It's the long tail of contributing factors to issues like what you describe. If 
any of the things I mentioned are wrong (SPF, DMARC, DKIM, etc.), you're going 
to have a WAAAYYY worse day than one-offs. Everything will be blocked. Yes, the 
one-off still won't go through, but there isn't much you can do about it. Focus 
on what you can control, not what you can't. Don't let perfect be the enemy of 
good enough.



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2025 10:57:42 AM
Subject: Re: [mailop] Mail Monitoring Service

Dnia  7.07.2025 o godz. 10:13:13 Mike Hammett via mailop pisze:
> In the big picture, I would still call that the long tail, at least in
> terms of non-marketing emails.

But for non-marketing senders (and recipients), that "long tail" is often
ALL the mail they sent.

If all I want to send is ONE important mail to ONE recipient at
Google/Microsoft/Yahoo, and that mail gets rejected/filed to spam folder,
then 100% of my *important, personal, non-marketing* email was lost. By no
means is it a "long tail" for me. It may be for Google/Microsoft/Yahoo, but
for me and for the person I sent mail to, it definitely isn't.

So we shouldn't simply disregard something as being a "long tail".
-- 
Regards,
   Jaroslaw Rafa
   [email protected]
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to