At 04:30 PM 8/17/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:50:11 -0400 >> From: Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >I'm not a make maintainer and don't really care about this one way or >> >the other. >> [...] >> I am not a make maintainer either, and care even less than you. > >Sorry, Bill, you lost me here: I thought you _did_ care about this, >since you submitted the patch and evidently did some testing, enough >to find a couple more issues that needed to be solved.
Sorry, this has been a rough process for me. I have been called many names over the past few days. Thank you for the support. I obviously care that the patch gets done. What I do not care about is the style of the code in make. The issue here is should sh_chars_sh be directly referenced or not. I think it should not, Chris things it should. It really is a matter of taste, and something for a make maintainer to choose. I just don't want to react to every suggestion with a new patch. -Bill _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list Make-w32@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
