On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:11:19PM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote: >I obviously care that the patch gets done. What I do not care about is >the style of the code in make. The issue here is should sh_chars_sh be >directly referenced or not. I think it should not, Chris things it >should. It really is a matter of taste, and something for a make >maintainer to choose. I just don't want to react to every suggestion >with a new patch.
Again, I don't think this is a matter of taste. I believe that you are introducing a real change in behavior, i.e., the use of sh_chars_sh was deliberate. cgf _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list Make-w32@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
