On Friday, April 19, 2002, at 03:23 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:32:29AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> >>> So what have we decided? >> >> Andreas is right. The present behavior breaks the documented >> behavior of >> the manicheck() function. > > And Ken will provide a fix?
I think you can just use the patch Andreas provided. Any patching I'd do would be to try to recover my original goal in a different way. There should also be a test that makes sure MANIFEST.SKIP isn't consulted in a manifind(), since we seem to be committing to that. -Ken
