Chris Browet wrote:

Zoom levels are fine (as an alternative, IMHO) if they are very clearly
defined in a generic/projection agnostic manner AND if scales are defined
too.
The only generally "recognized" zoom levels are map scales (e.g. 1:5000)
which are clear and precise for everyone. When you buy a printed map, the
scale is not defined by a zoom level ;-)

Yep, but most web maps are delivered in a tiled format into a resolution-dependent browser. In other words, the renderer has no idea what scale the map will be shown at. If I serve a bunch of standard 900913 tiles at z15, I don't know whether the user will be looking at them on a 72dpi monitor, a 96dpi monitor, or whatever - and that affects the scale.

I'd suggest that we standardise on a choice of:

  |z13    - means standard 900913 zoom level
  |s2500  - means 1:2,500 scale

Renderers should support at a minimum the |s format; the |z format is advisable if they are likely to be used in a web mapping context. Renderers should make the best judgement as to scale/zoom mappings based on the information available to them.

cheers
Richard


_______________________________________________
Mapcss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/mapcss

Reply via email to