On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:41, Komяpa <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/7/23 Chris Browet <[email protected]>: > > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:18, Komяpa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> 2010/7/20 Chris Browet <[email protected]>: > >> > Unless I'm mistaken, I understand the zoom level (as in "way|z1-11") > as > >> > "OSM > >> > TMS zoom level", right? > >> You may understand it that way if you want to. > > Yo mean the interpretation is up to the implementer? It might be > difficult > > to have consistent maps for a given style this way... > Everything is up to implementer for now. > You may understand that as OSM TMS zoomlevel (EPSG:3857), I may read > that as ScanEx TMS zoomlevel (EPSG:3395). > They're no more than 0.7% different however :) >
My point exactly ;) Leaving too much freedom of interpretation will make MapCSS rendering inconsistent, which is obviously not the goal.... > > > And defining a scale in terms of "tiles" would be very, very > > abstract/bizarre for people not knowing mapnik/TMS. > Who in OSM doesn't know about tiles? :) > Why limit MapCSS to OSM? - Chris -
_______________________________________________ Mapcss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/mapcss
