David MENTRE schrieb am Sat, 9 Jun 2012 13:38:09 +0200: >Hello Thomas, > >First of all, sorry for the very late answer.
Nvm, I try to make it up. :) >2012/5/28 malenki <[email protected]>: >> I realised that a lot of amentiy=* show up in the index of the >> created maps as Public Buildings and have only their name on it. >> This gets confusing when there is e.g. a post office in a stationery >> shop without a descriptive name. >> The result is e.g. an index entry "Stationery and Toys John Doe". >> My suggestion: prepend a (translatable) description of the amenity in >> front of its name. >> My example would be then: "Post Office: Stationery and Toys John Doe" > >I don't clearly see the use case. Would you have an example at hand? fyi: at least in my region it is quite common for a lot of stationery shops (and other kinds of shops too)) to be also a point to pick up or sent parcels and/or letters. (In the most small towns there isn't a dedicated post office anymore. If there is such a thing remaining, it is most likely integrated into a stationery shop because the ex parcel-and-letters monopolist wants to save money.) My first suggestion a little re-thought: It would be handier to add a subheading "parcel and letter services" or similar before listing the objects tagged with post_office. The map I recently created and refer to: http://dev.maposmatic.org/jobs/643 A screenshot from the part of the map index I refer to with explanations: http://malenki.ch/d/maposmatic_000643_2012-06-12_21-11_BrandErbisdorfenglish_publics.png These are the OSM objects marked with the explanations: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1277525793 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1311955430 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/334228706 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1278544510 Additionally, at "Villages" there is non of the five villages belonging to town rendered mentioned, but only one place=locality which shouldn't show up there imo. Regards Thomas
