+1 on Sangjin's proposal - 
"A minor release line is end-of-lifed 2 years after it is released or there
are 2 newer minor releases, whichever is sooner. The community reserves the
right to extend or shorten the life of a release line if there is a good
reason to do so."

I also noticed Karthik bring up some new proposals - some of them looks 
interesting to me and I have some ideas as well. Karthik, can you bring it out 
in a separated discussion threads so that we can discuss from there?

About Chris Trezzo's question about definition of EOL of hadoop release, I 
think potentially changes could be: 
1. For users of Apache hadoop, they would expect to upgrade to a new 
minor/major releases after EOL of their current release because there is no 
guarantee of new maintenance release.

2. For release effort, apache law claim that committer can volunteer RM for any 
release. With this release EOL proposal passes and written into hadoop bylaw, 
anyone want to call for a release which is EOL then she/he have to provide a 
good reason to community and get voted before to start release effort. We don't 
want to waste community time/resource to verify/vote a narrow interested 
release.

3. About committer's responsibility, I think the bottom line is committer 
should commit patch contributor's target release and her/his own interest 
release which I conservatively agree with Allen's point that this vote doesn't 
change anything. But if a committer want to take care more interest from the 
whole community like most committers are doing today, he/she should understand 
which branches can benefit more people and could skip some EOL release branches 
for backport effort.

About major release EOL, this could be more complicated and I think we should 
discuss separately.

Thanks,

Junping
________________________________________
From: Allen Wittenauer <a...@effectivemachines.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:30 PM
To: Chris Trezzo
Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release cadence and EOL

> On Jan 18, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Chris Trezzo <ctre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Sangjin for pushing this forward! I have a few questions:

        These are great questions, because I know I'm not seeing a whole lot of 
substance in this vote.  The way to EOL software in the open source universe is 
with new releases and aging it out.  If someone wants to be a RE for a new 
branch-1 release, more power to them.  As volunteers to the ASF, we're not on 
the hook to provide much actual support.  This feels more like a vendor play 
than a community one.  But if the PMC want to vote on it, whatever.  It won't 
be first bylaw that doesn't really mean much.

> 1. What is the definition of end-of-life for a release in the hadoop
> project? My current understanding is as follows: When a release line
> reaches end-of-life, there are no more planned releases for that line.
> Committers are no longer responsible for back-porting bug fixes to the line
> (including fixed security vulnerabilities) and it is essentially
> unmaintained.

        Just a point of clarification.  There is no policy that says that 
committers must back port.  It's up to the individual committers to push a 
change onto any particular branch. Therefore, this vote doesn't really change 
anything in terms of committer responsibilities here.

> 2. How do major releases affect the end-of-life proposal? For example, how
> does a new minor release in the next major release affect the end-of-life
> of minor releases in a previous major release? Is it possible to have a
> maintained 2.x release if there is a 3.3 release?

        I'm looking forward to seeing this answer too, given that 2.7.0 is 
probably past the 2 year mark, 2.8.0 has seemingly been in a holding pattern 
for over a year, and the next 3.0.0 alpha should be RSN....

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to