Hi, Yes it can be improved,
see my post on Mapserver development mailing list : http://n2.nabble.com/Export-SVG-with-and-without-Mapserver-td4098474.html. I solve the problem but without using Mapserver. I don’t know if it can be implemented in the SVG export in Mapserver. Regards, Maria 2009/12/2 Rahkonen Jukka <jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> > Peter Hopfgartner wrote: > > Hi Maria, > > > > the fact that a SVG rendered by MapServer is simplified makes > > sense, since what MapServer basically gives are maps, not raw > > data. Imagine that you want a map of all European countries, > > where your raw data has details down to something like a > > meter, the resulting SVG file would easily scale up to some > > GB of data. > > There is no need to output ugly SVG even for small areas just because > serving the whole world with the same resolution would leed to > difficulties. Maxscale/Minscale are used to control this situation in > other places, as well as MaxFeatures with WFS requests. The example > Maria sent looks ugly for me and I am sure it can be improved. > > Mapserver is sending raw data very effectively, as you said, through WFS > but also through WCS. > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > _______________________________________________ > mapserver-users mailing list > mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users >
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users