On Feb 4, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Alessandro Vesely >>> >>> + receiver. Senders of unsolicited reports, especially those >>> + sending large volumes of them mechanically, need to be aware >>> + of that and do all they reasonably can to avoid sending >>> + reports that cannot be used as a basis for action by the >>> + recipient - whether that is due to the report being sent >>> + about an incident that isn't abuse-related, it being sent to >>> + an email address that can't take action on it, or due to the >>> + content or format of the report being hard for the recipient >>> + to read or use. >> >> Non-actionable reports could still be useful for collecting statistics, >> whose evaluation may eventually result in a better sending. This is >> especially true for spf- or dkim-reporting. > > I think this fits under "take action on it".
I don't think so. If the report is not about an abusive behaviour on which the recipient of the report can take action, it's not something that should be sent unsolicited. If the recipient wants that sort of thing, they can ask for it. (And if they've not asked for it then the non-actionable reports you're sending are just ARF-formatted spam). Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
