> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] VERP in marf-as > > RFC 3834's role, however, has to be stated, lest opposing > interpretations pop out the same question over and over.
I don't agree. RFC3834 appears to be about how to write auto-responders like vacation services. In fact Section 3.2.1 suggests that there are cases where not using it is the right thing to do (DSNs, for example), and I think ARF is one of those cases. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
