> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [marf] Automatic Responses, was VERP > > > RFC3834 appears to be about how to write auto-responders like vacation > > services. In fact Section 3.2.1 suggests that there are cases where > > not using it is the right thing to do (DSNs, for example), and I think > > ARF is one of those cases. > > I think we ought to write that on the spec, otherwise it will be > debatable forever. > > Report generators are not automatic responders in the sense of > Section 3.2.1 of [RFC3834] > > would work for me.
Does anyone else think this is necessary? I don't think RFC3834 covers what we're doing here at all, so I don't think we need to be concerned about possible debate on the topic. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
