On 07/Feb/12 18:25, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> From: ietf.org On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > >> RFC 3834's role, however, has to be stated, lest opposing >> interpretations pop out the same question over and over. > > RFC3834 appears to be about how to write auto-responders like > vacation services. In fact Section 3.2.1 suggests that there are > cases where not using it is the right thing to do (DSNs, for > example), and I think ARF is one of those cases.
I think we ought to write that on the spec, otherwise it will be debatable forever. Report generators are not automatic responders in the sense of Section 3.2.1 of [RFC3834] would work for me. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
