Jason D. Clinton wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:15, Dave Neary <dne...@gnome.org> wrote: >> I buy that, but I think it's important that we have a "who is GNOME 3 >> *not* for (yet)" which covers audiences for whom GNOME 3 is not >> appropriate. And we need to have a story for them - such as "we >> recommend you stick with GNOME 2.32 for another 6 months", or whatever. > > There are no Enterprise distributions due out until at least the GNOME > 3.4 time frame so please let's focus on what we actually need to focus > on right now: the 3.0 launch.
<shrug> Not my call - I guess Allan & Sumana, in collaboration with the board, are fixing priorities for the next 2-3 weeks. The whole "fall-back" messaging & in particular the absence of a short list of places where this is known not to be appropriate seems to me to be setting us up for an entirely avoidable post-release shit-storm... but like I said, it's not my call. Dave. -- Dave Neary GNOME Foundation member dne...@gnome.org -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list