Yes, simulated wall time is much much slower than real wall time. If you're running at at say 2GHz, the simulator has to simulate 2 billion cycles for each of the n cores you're running per second. 4 minutes is 480B cycles -- which is a lot of cycles to simulate.
I hope I'm not misunderstanding your question. On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Xin Tong <[email protected]>wrote: > it seems that the timing on the simulated processor is slower than wall > clock time as well. i.e. one of the bencmarks i am running runs itself for > 4 mins. but the on the simulated ooo core processor, 4 mins seems to be > much longer then 4 mins wall clock time. > > > Thanks > > Xin > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.marss86.org > Marss86-Devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel > >
_______________________________________________ http://www.marss86.org Marss86-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel
