so it is using the rdtsc() to determine the time ? Thanks
Xin On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Paul Rosenfeld <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes, simulated wall time is much much slower than real wall time. If > you're running at at say 2GHz, the simulator has to simulate 2 billion > cycles for each of the n cores you're running per second. 4 minutes is 480B > cycles -- which is a lot of cycles to simulate. > > I hope I'm not misunderstanding your question. > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Xin Tong <[email protected]>wrote: > >> it seems that the timing on the simulated processor is slower than wall >> clock time as well. i.e. one of the bencmarks i am running runs itself for >> 4 mins. but the on the simulated ooo core processor, 4 mins seems to be >> much longer then 4 mins wall clock time. >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Xin >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> http://www.marss86.org >> Marss86-Devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel >> >> >
_______________________________________________ http://www.marss86.org Marss86-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel
