I believe so, but I think Avadh will have to answer that one for sure ... On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Xin Tong <[email protected]> wrote:
> so it is using the rdtsc() to determine the time ? > > Thanks > > Xin > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Paul Rosenfeld <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes, simulated wall time is much much slower than real wall time. If >> you're running at at say 2GHz, the simulator has to simulate 2 billion >> cycles for each of the n cores you're running per second. 4 minutes is 480B >> cycles -- which is a lot of cycles to simulate. >> >> I hope I'm not misunderstanding your question. >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Xin Tong <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> it seems that the timing on the simulated processor is slower than wall >>> clock time as well. i.e. one of the bencmarks i am running runs itself for >>> 4 mins. but the on the simulated ooo core processor, 4 mins seems to be >>> much longer then 4 mins wall clock time. >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Xin >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> http://www.marss86.org >>> Marss86-Devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ http://www.marss86.org Marss86-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel
