======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


 
My attitude to the Ukrainian question is guided by Lenin and Liebknecht in WWI. 
When the war broke out, neither got hung up on the question of who was the 
agressor or who fired the first shot. It was a conflict between rival 
imperialists.
This seems to me the case today, even though the US/EU are acting aggressively, 
and Russia more defensively. There is no longer 
any question about Russia being a "workers' state", and neither is it an 
underdeveloped country being victimized by the West. It is another 
capitalist-imperialist power, and our attitude should therefore be "a pox on 
both your houses".
 
The only principled question here is the self-determination of Crimea. Criimea 
was never a part of Ukraine historically, and it seems to me that its people 
should be free to determine their own national affiliations. I don't think the 
outcome of the referendum being held this weekend will be any different because 
of the presence of Russian troops than without them. The troops do guaraantee, 
however, that such a refrerendum will take place, which would not be likely if 
Kiev had its way.  

I also think Lenin's revolutionary defeatism, and Liebknecht's slogan, "The 
main enemy is at home!" are relevant here. These slogans were meant to ensure 
that anti-war socialists of the time did not proclaim their neutrality in the 
war while at the same time tilting toward their own bourgeoisie. The tilt, L & 
L were saying, should have been in the other direction. Without siding with 
Russia (and without making any facile comparisons to WWI), we should view our 
main responsibility as leftists and socialists as countering the anti-Russian 
propaganda campaign being waged by our own government and its Western European 
partners.I'm uncomfortable with the views of those who tend to concentrate 
their fire on Russia and Putin out of some misbegotten faith in the "masses" of 
Maidan. There is no Ukrainian left to speak of. Whatever tensions may exist 
within the liberal-fascist coalition of Kiev, it is serving as the internal 
agent of a US/EU attempt to rip off Ukraine for the IMF and NATO. (An
 d I'm not saying this out of some "mandarin" disdain for the "masses", but 
rather because there are many situations in which people in the streets figure 
less significantly in the outcome than the machinations of big powers; this, 
IMO, is one such situation)  Russia shouldn't dominate Ukraine either. But 
those whose main thrust is to denounce Russian imperialism come dangerously 
close to echoing the propaganda of their own ruling class.  
 
Jim Creegan
 
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to