********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

Are you really that unclear about the situation that is in the 9-11 report or 
are you being sarcastic? The Saudi royal family is a fractious, schismatic kind 
of mirror image of the American left. The interplay between al Queda and 
members of the royal family as opposed to the government is well documented. 
How much pull each family member has in an individual consulate or mosque in 
America is borne out by the historical record. Furthermore the fact that bin 
Laden was opposed to the royal family may not have been a huge factor in the 
behavior of the hijackers in America. How do you not get this?

Best regards,
Andrew Stewart 

> On Apr 18, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Louis Proyect <l...@panix.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/18/17 2:10 PM, Andrew Stewart via Marxism wrote:
>> 
>> The unredacted 9-11 report has the hijackers getting aid and financing from
>> both the Saudi diplomatic corps and their network of American theological
>> groupings centered around Wahhabi-brand mosques and other organizations.
>> This is pretty well documented in multiple sources.
>> 
>> https://28pages.org/2016/04/18/911-commission-investigators-proposed-examining-possible-political-economic-and-other-influences-on-inquiries-into-saudi-ties-to-attacks/
>> 
>> https://28pages.org/saudi-government-connections-to-911-shouldnt-stay-secret/
> 
> 
> So, you are saying that Saudi Arabia was behind 9/11 even though al-Qaeda had 
> declared war on the ruling family?
> 

_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to