Marv:
Sorry but I am confused.
You write:  "In an age of finance capitalism, what significance to attach to 
the fact that China’s financial system is state-owned and controlled?"
Surely that statement re-framed can be inverted, to apply to the USA - making 
the distinction you pose (between 'state' and private' capital) irrelevant?
I mean who "owns and controls" either NY bourse or the Federal Reserve? The 
inverted statement would run then as:
"In an age of finance capitalism, what significance to attach to the fact that 
America's financial system is state controlled for the benefit of the private 
capitalists who control the state?"
Maybe you view this as terribly naive. But I do believe that is the way to 
frame the matter.
Be well, Hari


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#29680): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/29680
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105142448/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to