Well, one has Switzerland to look at and no doubt Tito also likely looked at it 
as a successful example of what Michael was questioning. The issue is why it 
fell apart in Yugoslavia. Like the rise of religion in the ex-USSR 
inter-national rivalries were not so much "done away with" under Tito as it was 
suppressed. In fact that was true in the USSR as well. But there was also the 
conscious sabotage of what had been a pan-Yugoslavian working class that did 
exist and demonstrated its cohesion as Tito starting shifting the economy in 
order to fiscalize it in preparation for the Eurozone. A massive general strike 
in every region of Yugoslavia occurred. I suspect the nascent wannabe 
dictators, the appointed heads of the various ethnic division of the League of 
Communists simply got together and couldn't agree on who got what. In fact such 
a meeting did happen shortly after Tito's death. The result was the stirring up 
of old ethnic rivalries and the destruction of the Yugoslavian working class as 
a result of it. It is not about whether "they can all get along" but what 
prevents them from doing so.

David


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#30922): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/30922
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106824716/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to