> On Feb 24, 2026, at 12:34, hari kumar via groups.io > <[email protected]> wrote: > > the question remains Mark. > It cannot be answered in a simple rejection of an alternative. That is my > view anyway. > In the face of no concrete alternative structure, it seems to me there is an > air of agnosticism about the debate. As you recall, Engels called > ‘agnosticism' a ‘shame-faced materialism’.
Do you think that Peter Camejo was a "shame-faced materialist," Hari? He claimed otherwise: https://www.marxists.org/archive/camejo/1995/materialism.htm Mark -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#40831): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/40831 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/117948992/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
