> On Apr 21, 2026, at 15:41, Charles via groups.io 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I heard the account of events from someone who was there, someone who was 
> talking to a group not only to me, someone who had a lot to lose in respect 
> by this group if he was not reliable.
>  
> Comparing the details I presented with your reworking of them, the b.s. comes 
> from you.

Here's the only verifiable detail that we have discussed: NG were deployed to 
the streets of Minneapolis/St Paul. That fact causes me to question the report 
that the NG were too unreliable to deploy weeks earlier.

Let's just assume, however, that your source is correct: The first time the NG 
were activated for the streets, commanders determined that the troops were too 
unreliable to use, and the second time they were reliable enough to use. Fine. 

In that case, why expend organizing effort trying to get troops to refuse 
orders or exit the service? If troops are ready to rebel against their misuse, 
why not channel that into cooperative action rather than individual acts of 
conscience? Urge troops to use their rights, such as to petition congress to 
stop their deployment. Class-struggle strategies counter the power of capital 
with the power of mobilized masses. 

A large social movement can often find support inside a mass military 
organization, and even the US Marines in the case of the Black Power movement. 
From a class-struggle perspective, a mass organization is likely to have the 
political currents from the general population particularly if a mass movement 
reaches out to troops. 

It's happened in the past: Movements politically split the population, and 
those splits appear in the military, particularly the Army; the result may be 
an army with hostile internal camps (Oliver Stone's "Platoon"). In the US 
Vietnam war, the only thing troops could agree on by 1970 was Fuck the Army.

Dennis mentioned dogmatic purism, but I think the approach I am describing 
applies historical lessons going back to Zimmerwald, such as pacifism versus 
revolutionary defeatism. I would start with the lessons of the past before 
innovating.

Mark



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#41543): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/41543
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/118937890/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to