On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 12:21 +0000, Pedro Melo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Swartz <swa...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Oliver Paukstadt <pst...@sourcentral.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >> There is a test for this case as far as I understand line 104 in
> >> Mason-2.20/lib/Mason/t/ResolveURI.pm correct. But this one is designed
> >> wrong in my eyes. It fits the implementation, not what was reality
> >> before the 2.20 release and what is reasonable and expected.
> 
> No. That test is for dhandler + index presence.
> 
Line 101 in your fork, looks like Jon did some cleanup since 2.20
release.
Does this test conflict with the new check in line 107?

Regards,
Oliver Paukstadt
-- 
Oliver Paukstadt <pst...@sourcentral.org>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users

Reply via email to