Hi, On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Oliver Paukstadt <pst...@sourcentral.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 12:21 +0000, Pedro Melo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Swartz <swa...@pobox.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Jan 6, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Oliver Paukstadt <pst...@sourcentral.org> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> There is a test for this case as far as I understand line 104 in >> >> Mason-2.20/lib/Mason/t/ResolveURI.pm correct. But this one is designed >> >> wrong in my eyes. It fits the implementation, not what was reality >> >> before the 2.20 release and what is reasonable and expected. >> >> No. That test is for dhandler + index presence. >> > Line 101 in your fork, looks like Jon did some cleanup since 2.20 > release. > Does this test conflict with the new check in line 107?
Indeed, that test case is wrong (in the sense that the index should match), I'll remove it. And yes, it conflicts with 107. Looking at this now. Bye, -- Pedro Melo @pedromelo http://www.simplicidade.org/ http://about.me/melo xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org mailto:m...@simplicidade.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
