On Thursday 19 July 2007 6:31:26 pm Christopher Barker wrote: > > There is also the question of whether > > we want to pay up and use 4x4 from the ground up and just ignore the > > 3rd dimension to open the door for 3D support. > > I say yes! 3-d really is a very often needed and requested feature. > Sure, we can go to VTK or something for really sophisticated 3-d work, > but being able to do the basic stuff with MPL would be wonderful. > > If the framework supports it cleanly internally, it's much more likely > that the 3-d stuff will get written.
I also think we should use 4x4 affines, and ignore the third dimension. 10 years down the line, we might look back and regret not taking advantage of this opportunity. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
