On 7/20/07, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > = Chaco and Kiva = > > It is a good idea for an enterprising developer to take a careful look > at the current Chaco and Kiva to see if we can further integrate with > them. I am gun shy because they seem formiddable and complex, and one > of my major goals here is to streamline and simplify, but they are > incredible pieces of work and we need to carefully consider them, > especially as we integrate other parts of the enthought suite into our > core, eg traits, increasing the possibility of synergies.
Chaco may be formidable and complex, but so is the list of features and requirements you just posted. What about just focusing on a Pylab wrapper for Chaco? And working with Peter to make Chaco everything you envison. Or does Chaco have the same needs-a-rewrite architecture issues as the mpl? Just to be clear, I don't have any first hand experience with Chaco, other than running the demos once. The main problems with Chaco I'm aware of are 1) entanglement with the rest of ETS, which they're working on, 2) no pylab like easy-to-use interface. --bb ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
