Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
> Eric Firing wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> A bug was recently pointed out: axhline, axvline, axhspan, axvspan
>> mess up the ax.dataLim. I committed a quick fix for axhline and
>> axvline, but I don't think that what I did is a good solution, so
>> before doing anything for axhspan and axvspan I want to arrive at a
>> better strategy.
>>
>> What is needed is a clean way to specify that only the x or the y part
>> of ax.dataLim be updated when a line or patch (or potentially anything
>> else) is added. This is specifically for the case, as in *line, where
>> one axis is in data coordinates and the other is in normalized
>> coordinates--we don't want the latter to have any effect on the dataLim.
>>
>> This could be done in python in any of a variety of ways, but I
>> suspect that to be most consistent with the way the transforms code is
>> now written, relying on update_path_extends from _path.cpp, it might
>> make sense to append two boolean arguments to that cpp function,
>> "update_x" and "update_y", and use kwargs in Bbox.update_from_path and
>> siblings to set these, with default values of True.
> It seems we could do this without touching C at all. Just change
> update_from_path so it only updates certain coordinates in the bounding
> box based on the kwargs you propose. Sure, the C side will be keeping
> track of y bounds even when it doesn't have to, but I doubt that matters
> much compared to checking a flag in the inner loop. It will compute the
> bezier curves for both x and y anyway (without digging into Agg). It's
> hard to really estimate the performance impact, so I'm necessarily
> pushing for either option, but it may save having to update the C.
Mike,
I was somehow thinking that update_path_extents was changing things in
place--completely wrong. So yes, it is trivial to make the change at
the python level, and that is definitely the place to do it. I will try
to take care of it this evening.
In poking around, however, I came up with a couple of questions.
Neither is a blocker for what I need to do, but each might deserve a
comment in the code, if nothing else.
1) in _path.cpp:
void get_path_extents(PathIterator& path, const agg::trans_affine& trans,
double* x0, double* y0, double* x1, double* y1,
double* xm, double* ym)
{
typedef agg::conv_transform<PathIterator> transformed_path_t;
typedef agg::conv_curve<transformed_path_t> curve_t;
double x, y;
unsigned code;
transformed_path_t tpath(path, trans);
curve_t curved_path(tpath);
curved_path.rewind(0);
while ((code = curved_path.vertex(&x, &y)) != agg::path_cmd_stop)
{
if ((code & agg::path_cmd_end_poly) == agg::path_cmd_end_poly)
continue;
/* if (MPL_notisfinite64(x) || MPL_notisfinite64(y))
continue;
We should not need the above, because the path iterator
should already be filtering out invalid values.
*/
if (x < *x0) *x0 = x;
if (y < *y0) *y0 = y;
if (x > *x1) *x1 = x;
if (y > *y1) *y1 = y;
if (x > 0.0 && x < *xm) *xm = x;
if (y > 0.0 && y < *ym) *ym = y;
}
}
In the last 2 lines, why are xm and ym being clipped at 0, when x0 and
y0 are not?
2) It looks like update_path_extents throws away orientation by always
returning x0 and y0 as the minima. Bbox.update_from_path is therefore
doing the same. This doesn't hurt in present usage, since orientation
is not needed for dataLim, but it seems a bit surprising, and worth a
comment at least. Am I again missing something obvious?
Eric
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
