Firstly I would like to excuse for the triple posting.
I loosed the reactive limits of every generator to [-2.5 MVar , 2.5 MVar]
and it converges.

Thank you for your answers.

Alexandros Gesios

2016-11-24 14:33 GMT+02:00 Alexandros Gesios <alexandrosges...@gmail.com>:

> I uploaded a file which shows the network configuration
>
> 2016-11-24 13:45 GMT+02:00 Alexandros Gesios <alexandrosges...@gmail.com>:
>
>> The bus 1 has constant voltage and it is considered as an infinite bus.
>> The negative active power means that PVs send power to the grid.
>>
>> Στις 24 Νοε 2016 13:33, ο χρήστης "Saranya A" <asar...@gmail.com> έγραψε:
>>
>>> I dont see in the case file where you have connected the Bus 1 to the
>>> grid.
>>> Can you clarify on this?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Alexandros Gesios <
>>> alexandrosges...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bus 1 represents the grid connection which has negative active power
>>>> because the active power from PV is larger that the load active power.
>>>>
>>>> Στις 24 Νοε 2016 07:38, ο χρήστης "Saranya A" <asar...@gmail.com>
>>>> έγραψε:
>>>>
>>>>> I ran the "casePV3" and observed that bus 1 which is slack bus has Pg
>>>>> as -3MW. Can a bus which has photovoltaic unit as generator observe real
>>>>> power? I am not pretty aware of the power electronics of it. I think if 
>>>>> you
>>>>> can reason that out you may get some direction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Saranya A
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Alexandros Gesios <
>>>>> alexandrosges...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ι made some changes in the matrices and OPF completes but I do not
>>>>>> think that it allocates the reactive power among the PVs in an optimal 
>>>>>> way
>>>>>> regarding the losses.
>>>>>> The last three PVs absorb Qm reactive power while the other operate
>>>>>> in a unity power factor.
>>>>>> I attach the case in order to be more specific. Also the network is
>>>>>> radial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-11-23 20:46 GMT+02:00 Alexandros Gesios <
>>>>>> alexandrosges...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dr. Zimmerman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I applied the change you have mentioned and the result is the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MATPOWER Version 6.0b1, 01-Jun-2016 -- AC Optimal Power Flow
>>>>>>> MATLAB Interior Point Solver -- MIPS, Version 1.2.1, 01-Jun-2016
>>>>>>>  (using built-in linear solver)
>>>>>>> Numerically Failed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did not converge in 9 iterations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>  Did NOT converge (0.11 seconds)  <<<<<
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-11-23 19:54 GMT+02:00 Ray Zimmerman <r...@cornell.edu>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think you want to change the first column of your gencost entries
>>>>>>>> to 2 (polynomial) instead of 1 (piecewise linear). Hopefully, that 
>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>> your problem and it will solve.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    Ray
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > On Nov 23, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Alexandros Gesios <
>>>>>>>> alexandrosges...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Hello to everyone
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I am new to MATPOWER and I am trying to operate an OPF analysis
>>>>>>>> in a MV grid constisted of two feeders.
>>>>>>>> > The first feeder has 10 inductive loads and the second feeder has
>>>>>>>> 10 photovoltaic units and their are connected to the grid by the slack 
>>>>>>>> bus.
>>>>>>>> > What I want to achieve is loss minimization by allocating the
>>>>>>>> reactive power among the photovoltaic units in a optimal way. The 
>>>>>>>> nominal
>>>>>>>> active power of the PV units is 10.6 MW and the load is 6 MW so the 
>>>>>>>> extra
>>>>>>>> active power is being absorbed by the HV/MV Grid.
>>>>>>>> > Also I want the slack bus to operate at constant 1.05 pu voltage
>>>>>>>> so in the mpc.bus slack bus has voltage limits Vmax=Vmin=1.05.
>>>>>>>> > Also I want the PV units to operate in nominal power so in
>>>>>>>> mpc.gen their active power limits are Pmax=Pmin=Pnom.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Finally the mpc.gencost matrix constists of 11 rows and every row
>>>>>>>> has these elements     1    0       0       2       2   4; because I 
>>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>>> in the archive that in order to achieve loss minimization you need the 
>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>> linear costs in the gencost matrix.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > When I run runopf(mycase) I take the following errors
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Index exceeds matrix dimensions.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Error in opf_setup (line 84)
>>>>>>>> >   x1 = mpc.gencost(pwl1, COST+2);
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Error in opf (line 198)
>>>>>>>> > om = opf_setup(mpc, mpopt);
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Error in runopf (line 75)
>>>>>>>> > [r, success] = opf(casedata, mpopt);
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Also, I would like to ask whether my problem can be formulated in
>>>>>>>> MATPOWER.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thank you in advance
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Alexandros Gesios
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to