Hi Jubeyer,

I did not understand the question, or questions.

do you mean SCOPF?, I mean several contingencies?

regards

_________________________________
Sergio Rivera, E.E, PhD, IEEE Senior Member

Fulbright Scholar

University of Florida
Associate Professor
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

email: srrive...@unal.edu.co

webs:

http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/liines/people/sergio/index.php

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sergio_Rivera/contributions

http://mechatronics.mit.edu/sergio/

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=BP8jANUAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate


El jue., 21 feb. 2019 a las 21:55, Jubeyer Rahman (<jube...@hawaii.edu>)
escribió:

> Hi Professor Rodriguez,
>
> Weren't some of those test cases in those competitions, asking for optimal
> real and reactive power dispatch(ORPD,OARPD) solution; like objective
> function was to minimize the fuel cost? In that case, how, by just only
> running a PF after contingency can give a reasonable solution. Seems like,
> checking the feasibility only should not be good enough.
>
> Regards
> Jubeyer
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:49 AM Sergio Raul Rivera Rodriguez <
> srrive...@unal.edu.co> wrote:
>
>> Dear Jubeyer,
>>
>> the way we did in the IEEE optimization competitions of 2014, 2017 and
>> 2018 was (where we used matpower):
>>
>> http://sites.ieee.org/psace-mho/2018-operational-planning-of-sustainable-electrical-power-systems-competition-panel/
>>
>> Run an OPF
>> Apply a contingency
>> Run a PF
>> Check Feasibility of the system in contingency
>>
>> best regards
>>
>> _________________________________
>> Sergio Rivera, E.E, PhD, IEEE Senior Member
>> Fulbright Visiting Scholar
>>
>> University of Florida
>>
>> Associate Professor
>> Universidad Nacional de Colombia
>>
>> email: srrive...@unal.edu.co
>>
>> webs:
>>
>> http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/liines/people/sergio/index.php
>>
>> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sergio_Rivera/contributions
>>
>> http://mechatronics.mit.edu/sergio/
>>
>>
>> https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=BP8jANUAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate
>>
>>
>> El vie., 15 feb. 2019 a las 11:04, Jubeyer Rahman (<jube...@hawaii.edu>)
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to figure out, how matpower deals with contingencies in
>>> 'Optimal Power Flow' process. For example, if I want to see the OPF result
>>> after a contingency take place, should I manually make the status of that
>>> branch status from '1 to zero' or is there any automatic way to do that?
>>> Same question goes for generators, should I just change the status of it or
>>> is there any other way of doing it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jubeyer
>>>
>>

Reply via email to