Hi Jubeyer, I did not understand the question, or questions.
do you mean SCOPF?, I mean several contingencies? regards _________________________________ Sergio Rivera, E.E, PhD, IEEE Senior Member Fulbright Scholar University of Florida Associate Professor Universidad Nacional de Colombia email: srrive...@unal.edu.co webs: http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/liines/people/sergio/index.php https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sergio_Rivera/contributions http://mechatronics.mit.edu/sergio/ https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=BP8jANUAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate El jue., 21 feb. 2019 a las 21:55, Jubeyer Rahman (<jube...@hawaii.edu>) escribió: > Hi Professor Rodriguez, > > Weren't some of those test cases in those competitions, asking for optimal > real and reactive power dispatch(ORPD,OARPD) solution; like objective > function was to minimize the fuel cost? In that case, how, by just only > running a PF after contingency can give a reasonable solution. Seems like, > checking the feasibility only should not be good enough. > > Regards > Jubeyer > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:49 AM Sergio Raul Rivera Rodriguez < > srrive...@unal.edu.co> wrote: > >> Dear Jubeyer, >> >> the way we did in the IEEE optimization competitions of 2014, 2017 and >> 2018 was (where we used matpower): >> >> http://sites.ieee.org/psace-mho/2018-operational-planning-of-sustainable-electrical-power-systems-competition-panel/ >> >> Run an OPF >> Apply a contingency >> Run a PF >> Check Feasibility of the system in contingency >> >> best regards >> >> _________________________________ >> Sergio Rivera, E.E, PhD, IEEE Senior Member >> Fulbright Visiting Scholar >> >> University of Florida >> >> Associate Professor >> Universidad Nacional de Colombia >> >> email: srrive...@unal.edu.co >> >> webs: >> >> http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/liines/people/sergio/index.php >> >> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sergio_Rivera/contributions >> >> http://mechatronics.mit.edu/sergio/ >> >> >> https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=BP8jANUAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate >> >> >> El vie., 15 feb. 2019 a las 11:04, Jubeyer Rahman (<jube...@hawaii.edu>) >> escribió: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> I am trying to figure out, how matpower deals with contingencies in >>> 'Optimal Power Flow' process. For example, if I want to see the OPF result >>> after a contingency take place, should I manually make the status of that >>> branch status from '1 to zero' or is there any automatic way to do that? >>> Same question goes for generators, should I just change the status of it or >>> is there any other way of doing it? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Jubeyer >>> >>