On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 17:35 +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote: > I'd agree with this. Maypole should be simple to use, if you want to > provide stuff in your model for use outside of maypole, then that is > beyond the scope of this project (for now at least, maybe version 3).
My point is that this stuff should already be in the model and so available for Maypole to use without extra configuration. That makes it even simpler to use Maypole. The deficiency is in the current model implementation, not in the Maypole framework. So we should fix the model. That's what Peter did, it's what Dave implemented in CDBI-FB and what I did with my autogenerated code. Why is it now suddenly wrong? Cheers, Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Maypole-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maypole-users
