On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After Jake told me about LAME, I went and downloaded and compared it to
> L3enc and BladeEnc... I must say, I am amazed at the difference between it
> and Blade -- it's like going from 80 kbps MP3 to a MD. :)
In case anyone hasn't looked, either the documentation that comes with
BladeEnc or the program's website, says that it was NOT designed for low
bitrate encoding. The author designed it for 160+kbps. Personally, anything
below 128kbps sounds like crap anyway.
--
Jason K. Fritcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d-(+) s+:++ a-- C++@ UB++++S+++$ P++(-) L- !E W+(--) N++(+) o? K-
w--() O M- !V PS(+) PE Y+ PGP(++) t+@ 5 X+ R>+ tv+(--) b+>++ DI D++ G
e h--- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
