Thanks, "Assume nothing" is a pretty scientific approach,I like it :) But this (absence of) assumption lead me to think about another couple of things: what about all the encoders/decoders or any program that rely on data access patterns to pretend to be and remain "fast"? Writing mechanichal sympathetic code means being smart enough to trick the compiler in new and more creative ways or check what a compiler doesn't handle so well,trying to manage it by yourself? The last one is a very strong statement just for the sake of discussion..But I'm curious to know what the guys of this group think about it :)
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mechanical-sympathy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mechanical-sympathy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
