I think it would be best if it was possible to hook the function for config load or overwrite whole class for config so that it's possible to create an extension which could change whole storage for configuration.
In that case we wouldn't need to change anything, the standard version would use a file, and tweaked version would have a gui. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Svip <svi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 February 2012 14:04, Steve VanSlyck <s.vansl...@spamcop.net> wrote: > > > There's no reason that GUI failure need prevent text editor access to a > configuration file. > > One might wonder if a GUI-page could overwrite one's configuration > file, even accidentally. A backup would be nice in such a case. But > it does create a new level of uncertainty for administrators. > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
