On 24 March 2010 18:10, Wichmann, Mats D <mats.d.wichm...@intel.com> wrote: > meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: >> For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a >> default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in the >> MeeGo project. >> >> Maybe the social contract sounds very free-software "fanatic" for a >> company, but is one of the best warranties to offer a complete open >> source project. >> >> Besides, it would be a signal of commitment with the community, and it >> will encourage participation in the development. > > My completely personal, completely unofficial reaction is > that this would have a LOT of problems on the Tivoization > front, as it seems to me everybody below the netbook and > possible tablet type device is interested in some level of > locking down their image... Don't know if it looks that > way to the rest of you or I'm just being too pessimistic?
For this reason we should create the methods to stops this kind of activities. Maybe some vendors are going to take the way of open source and others not. In the second case we should show that is not a viable alternative. Cheers, Adrian. > > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
