Am Montag 24 Mai 2010 schrieb Thiago Macieira: > As for the stacked windows, maybe it's a matter of determining if that's a > feature that is wanted? Maybe the target UX won't have them, so they > shouldn't > be ported, but instead adapted to the new concept.
>From my personal developers point of view i really don't care that much about >the details. Most of my apps were initially developed for Maemo4 and were able to run on plain gtk as well. They then have been ported to Maemo5. The first three screenshots at http://gpxview.garage.maemo.org/ e.g. show the same screen on all three UIs using very different UI concepts (HildonBreadCrumbTrail on Maemo4, StackableWindows on Maemo5 and ordinary gtk widgets under plain gtk). I know that many other Maemo developers keep their stuff similar flexible. This means that all those developers are used to #ifdef their work around UI differences and don't care if a slightly different window concept requires some special treatment here and there. Hundreds of hours of time have been spent writing these apps. Spending a few more to give them a Meego future is sure something many developers are willing to invest. For me it's more important to have some solution nicely integrated into meego than having one that's 100% compatible with the maemo5 apis. I am willing to test port my applications against anything you guys come up with. Till _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
