> ----- Original message ----- > From: "Dirk Hohndel" <dirk.hohn...@intel.com> > To: "Nicola Mfb" <nicola....@gmail.com>, "Development for the MeeGo Project (discussion list)" <meego-dev@meego.com> > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] After handset day one - a plea for openness > Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:32:54 -0700 > > > > > * not official support of meego on some hardware is community driven? > > Again, the default builds that we provide are optimized for Atom - I > don't think there's anything wrong with that. It's fairly straight > forward to build for other platforms if you need that, but I think it is > not a reasonable request that we shouldn't optimize for our platform. >
I guess this is one part I don't quite get, so forgive my ignorance.� Given the eventual breadth of MeeGo, shouldn't the default be agnostic to vendor-specific optimizations?� Then of course there would be an Atom-optimized build from Intel...� ARM-specific from others... et al... Thanks for any clarification. Randy -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
